A prosecutor's statement moved the Normandy TER derailment back onto an evidentiary track, saying the record did not yet allow investigators to describe it as a malicious act or an attack. The statement leaves the derailment under inquiry without adopting the sharper public label that had begun to attach to it. [E1]
That sequence matters because attribution had already become political language. Tagesschau reported early Sunday that the prosecutor's position clashed with comments by Eric Ciotti and Herve Morin, who had called the incident an attack or a criminal act before the official line settled against that wording. [E2]
The supported change is therefore not a finding about cause. It is a change in authority: elected figures used an attack frame, and the prosecutor's account then said the available evidence did not yet carry that conclusion. The public record can hold both facts without turning the earlier political claim into an investigative result. [E1] [E2]
The next meaningful shift would have to come from the inquiry itself. Evidence that investigators identify malice, an attack, or a responsible actor would change the present account; until then, the supported sequence is narrower: a derailment, competing public descriptions, and an official warning against treating the case as an attack. [E1] [E2]